Cases 161 - 170 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smallwood v. Goodwin et al
as 1:2009cv01882
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Smallwood
Defendant:
James Goodwin, John M Manos, Gregory White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Millen v. Memphis Mental Health Institut, et al
as 09-5505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN MILLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MEMPHIS MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE, "MMHI", CITY OF MEMPHIS and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, "USPS"
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2008cv02631
Plaintiff:
Berniece Williams
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Lee County and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nick Kolev v. Rabbi Davidi, et al
as 08-56790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICK A. KOLEV, P.E. Ph.D.
Defendant:
RABBI NISSIM DAVIDI, Administrator Rabbinical Council of California (RCC), RABBI MENACHEM GENACK, Rabbinic Administr Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations (OU), THOMAS N. LEDVINA, Associate GC Office of the General Counsel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mark Larkin v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 08-56133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK LARKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, Admin Remedy Coordinator BOP, ROBERT MCFADDEN, Director Western Region BOP, J. L. NORWOOD, Warden USP Victorville and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-16340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
