Cases 181 - 190 of 8,544
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 3:2024cv30027
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank, Monarch Recovery Management Inc., Ratchford Law Group P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brum et al v. Bristol County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv10344
Plaintiff:
Nelson Brum and Leo V Johnson
Defendant:
Bristol County Sheriff's Office and Paul Heroux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
as 1:2024cv10331
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mazza v. City Of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10333
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mazza
Defendant:
City Of Boston, Frank J. Olbrys, Edward Kennealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks v. Town of Worthington et al
as 3:2024cv30024
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Brooks
Defendant:
Town of Worthington, Charles S. Rose, Amy C. Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Town of Chester et al
as 3:2024cv30023
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Brooks
Defendant:
Town of Chester, John Baldasaro, Richard Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
