Cases 11 - 20 of 318
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co, et al
as 23-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO, HILLS PET NUTRITION, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Defendant:
MS. KIM, DEBRA NICHOLS, DAVE BALOGA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Okuda v. UCSF Mental Institution et al
as 4:2023cv03789
Plaintiff:
Zohreh Okuda
Defendant:
UCSF Mental Institution, UCSF Hospital Langley Porter, Jan Chung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Daniel Chung v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 23-16103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PAUL CHUNG, an individual and DANIEL CHUNG, an individual
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a public entity
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY F. ROSEN, individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
