Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Lovings v. Cathey, et al.
as 3:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Edwin Glenn Cathey and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Angela Lovings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moorish Science Temple of America et al v. ACE Cash Express et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2015cv00144
Plaintiff:
Moorish Science Temple of America and Rasull Abdul Sufi
Defendant:
ACE Cash Express and Tom Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Headway Workforce Solutions, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2014cv00548
Plaintiff:
James E. Love
Defendant:
Headway Workforce Solutions, Unique Solutions Design USA, Ltd., Kathy Roma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1322
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2011cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2009cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.