Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Teeman et al v. Department of Social and Health Services
as 1:2015cv03138
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Teeman and Andrea Joy Lyons
Defendant:
Department of Social and Health Services , Child Protective Services , Claudia Rocha Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahoney et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2014cv00794
Plaintiff:
Robert Mahoney, Sjon C Stevens, Cliff Borjeson and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder, City of Seattle , Ed Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Lamar Culp, et al. vs. Benton County, et al.
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Culp , Earmer Lee Culp and K.M.C.
Defendant:
Benton County , Steven Keane, Darrell Isaacson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wahsise v. Toppenish, City of et al
as 2:2013cv03060
Plaintiff:
Marlon Delanie Wahsise
Defendant:
Toppenish, City of , - City of Toppenish Police Department , D Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McDonald v. Warner et al
as 2:2012cv05089
Plaintiff:
Scott W McDonald
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Jane Doe Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez et al v. Diaz et al
as 2:2012cv03070
Plaintiff:
Jose C Sanchez , Elizabeth Sanchez and Jose S Sanchez, Jr
Defendant:
Adam Diaz , Derrick Perez , Thomas Michael Radke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
