Cases 11 - 20 of 172
Nelson v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2023cv05609
Plaintiff:
TRINICE NELSON
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Tacoma Police Dept, Pierce County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Pierce County Housing Authority
as 3:2023cv05320
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Pierce County Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Martinez v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05919
Plaintiff:
Karen Martinez
Defendant:
Pierce County, Kim DeMarco, Sandi Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stevens v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05862
Plaintiff:
Randall Stevens
Defendant:
Pierce County, Colby Edwards, Greggory Marty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundy et al v. Pierce County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2022cv05405
Plaintiff:
Jacob Leroy Lundy and Weldon Leroy Lundy
Defendant:
Pierce County Sheriff's Department, Lucas Baker, 1-5 Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05142
Plaintiff:
Jenni Ellis
Defendant:
Pierce County, Levi Redding, Jane Doe Redding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05139
Plaintiff:
Annmarie Gordon
Defendant:
Pierce County and Holiday Inn Express
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
French v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05079
Plaintiff:
Thomas C French and Thomas French
Defendant:
Pierce County, JOHN / JANE DOE OFFICERS 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
