Cases 11 - 20 of 69
United States of America v. Twin Creek Apartments, LLC
as 8:2018cv00428
Defendant:
Twin Creek Apartments, LLC d/b/a Pavillion at Twin Creek and Twin Creek Apartments, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Nimmer v. Heavican et al
as 4:2018cv03123
Defendant:
Hon. John R Freudenberg, Hon. William B. Cassel, Hon. Lindsey Miller-Lerman and others
Plaintiff:
John C Nimmer and John C. Nimmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Sessions
as 8:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Georgia M. Scott
Defendant:
Jefferson B. Sessions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bush v. Dryer et al
as 4:2018cv03085
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush
Defendant:
Jessica Dryer and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Stanko et al v. Bosselman et al
as 4:2017cv03151
Defendant:
Jack Anderson, Brandi Bosselman, Aaron Conn and others
Plaintiff:
Nebraska Beef Packers, Inc. and Rudy B Stanko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
