Cases 11 - 20 of 124
Guan v. O'Grady et al
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, James C. Clark, Jen Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Leiser, et al vs. Goodwyn, et al
as 1:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Phillip B. Leiser, Esq., Rasheed Bowen, Keith Gilligan and others
Defendant:
S. Bernard Goodwyn, Thomas P. Mann and Michael F. Devine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Guan v. Liam O'Grady, et al.
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alice Guan
Defendant:
Liam O'Grady, James C. Clark, Jen Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchins v. Arlington County Mental Behavioral Health Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
Arlington County Mental Behavioral Health Dept., Michael T. Baylous, Officer A. Sawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Daulton, Trooper
as 6:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clark
Defendant:
Andrew Daulton, Trooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raposo v. Clark
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michael Raposo
Defendant:
Fred Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
