Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson v. Minneapolis, City of et al
as 0:2011cv03070
Plaintiff:
Demetris Robinson
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of , John Paul Chamberlain and David Allan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Fischer et al
as 0:2011cv02792
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Molly Fischer, James Frost, Sherral Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Olson et al
as 0:2011cv02314
Plaintiff:
Isaac Ward
Defendant:
Kevin Olson , Heather Robinson , Thomas Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hanson et al
as 0:2011cv01944
Plaintiff:
Tawana Robinson
Defendant:
A Hanson , John Does and Minneapolis, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartigan v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2010cv03167
Plaintiff:
Julie Hartigan
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Plymouth, City of, Gislason, Martin, Varpness & Janes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robinson v. Minneapolis, City of et al
as 0:2010cv03067
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of, Mark Lanasa, James Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson et al v. Ramsey, County of et al
as 0:2008cv05779
Plaintiff:
Richard Robinson, Richard Robinson, Richard Robinson and others
Defendant:
Ramsey, County of, Jeff Allen, Mary Clausen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv04948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zanders et al v. Swanson et al
as 0:2007cv02171
Plaintiff:
Rashard Zanders, Lydia Howell, Jill M Waite and others
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Michael O Freeman and Jay Heffern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
