Civil Rights Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv02479
Plaintiff: Davenell H Ash and Davenell L Ash
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Duluth Police Dept, Hibbing Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv02459
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion)
Ash v. Lee et al
as 0:2022cv01804
Plaintiff: Davenell H Ash
Defendant: Rich Lee, Troy Loeb, Lee Ann Garbano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv01687
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01671
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. City of St. Paul et al
as 0:2022cv01257
Plaintiff: Matilda Ann Smith
Defendant: City of Saint Paul, John Corcoran, Michael Tschida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Coffman et al
as 0:2022cv00873
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain and Delzs Rigarte Cineus
Defendant: Cynthia Coffman, Jared Polis, Philip J. Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00832
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Tucker v. Boldo
as 0:2022cv00702
Plaintiff: Debbie Ann Tucker
Defendant: Alejandro Boldo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Handy Stop et al
as 0:2021cv01696
Plaintiff: Brenda Ann Smith
Defendant: Handy Stop and Stuart Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?