Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Burn Hookah Bar, Inc. et al v. City of Southfield, Michigan
as 2:2019cv11413
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason, Burn Hookah Bar, Inc. and Anniece Warren
Defendant:
City of Southfield, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv11737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barnes et al v. County of Oakland et al
as 2:2017cv13791
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Barnes , Metro Detroit Compassion Club, Inc. , The Burn, Inc. and others
Defendant:
County of Oakland, Oakland County Sheriff's Department, Michael Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv13115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. Centerra Group et al
as 2:2017cv12643
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Brown
Defendant:
Centerra Group, Michael Syzmanski and Jennifer Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Denhollander et al v. Michigan State University et al
as 1:2017cv00029
Defendant:
Michigan State University, Jeffrey R. Kovan, USA Gymnastics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Denhollander, Lindsey Schuett, Melissa Vigogne and others
Petitioner:
Chloe Alysse Myers
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jane KMSU Doe, Jane Y. Doe, Jane JMSU Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. Federspiel et al
as 1:2016cv13939
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
William L. Federspiel, JASON HUISKENS, VINCENT ALVIN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jody Lynn Ferguson
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Dean Roesler, Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
