Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Gamauf v. Buerger et al
as 1:2015cv08644
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gamauf
Defendant:
Geoffrey Buerger and City of Hickory Hills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Grimes v. City of Hickory, et al
as 5:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Willie James Grimes
Defendant:
City of Hickory , Floyd Lucas, Jr. , Tom Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Glen Chapman v. Dennis Rhoney
as 12-1758
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLEN EDWARD CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
DENNIS ALVIN RHONEY, in his individual capacity and ROBERT A. MULLINAX, in his individual capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Mark Richardson Sams
Defendant:
CITY OF HICKORY
Larry McCloud v. Melissa Hildebrand
as 10-2351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LARRY MCCLOUD, Administrator of the Estate of Garry Wayne McCloud
Defendant - Appellant:
MELISSA HILDEBRAND and CITY OF HICKORY
Salerno v. Wee Sit et al
as 1:2009cv07919
Plaintiff:
Steven M Salerno
Defendant:
Ervin C Wee Sit, Ervin C Wee Sit, Ervin C Wee Sit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Danny Rowell v. City of Hickory
as 08-1791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY ROWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HICKORY and T. E. HUNT
McCloud v. Hildebrand et al
as 3:2007cv00325
Plaintiff:
Larry McCloud
Defendant:
Melissa Hildebrand and City of Hickory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McCloud v. Hildebrand et al
as 5:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
Larry McCloud
Defendant:
Melissa Hildebrand and City of Hickory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
