Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Millen v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv02524
Plaintiff:
Kevin Millen
Defendant:
James Clark and Doris Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Clark v. Jackson
as 1:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ms. Rachel Clark and Rachel Clark
Defendant:
William L. Jackson and William L. Jackson Official Capacity as the CEO of Chattanooga-Hamilton Hospital d/b/a Erlanger Health System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Millen v. DeJoy et al
as 2:2021cv02734
Plaintiff:
Kevin Millen
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy and James Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Rausch et al
as 3:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Clark
Defendant:
David B. Rauch, Tony C. Parker and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurt v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Devona Clark, Carla White, Carol Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hurt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. City of Memphis
as 2:2021cv02365
Plaintiff:
Likisha Clark
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Counselor Hannah, Jailer Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
