Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Utreras v. Chicago Title Insurance Company et al
as 1:2012cv04766
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance Company and John Doe #1-3
Plaintiff:
Manuel Utreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPEED v. MILLS et al
as 1:2012cv01368
Plaintiff:
CARLOS SPEED
Defendant:
BOBBY MILLS , R.C. KELLY AND ASSOCIATES, INC., ROBERT C. KELLY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
BOBBY MILLS
Third_party_defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Marcia Perkins v. Neighborhood Improvement Devel, et al
as 08-2334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCIA E. PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, LANDMARK CREDIT UNION, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Perkins v. Neighborhood Improvement Development Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
Marcia Elaine Perkins
Defendant:
Neighborhood Improvement Development Corporation, Landmark Credit Union, Chicago Title Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bruhl v. Slotky et al
as 3:2007cv03179
Plaintiff:
Edwin P Bruhl, .
Defendant:
Ben Slotky, McLean County Sheriff, McLean County Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruhl v. Slotky et al
as 1:2007cv01196
Plaintiff:
Edwin P Bruhl, .
Defendant:
Ben Slotky, McLean County Sheriff, McLean County Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
