Cases 11 - 20 of 23
ASSA'AD-FALTAS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
MARIE-THERESE H. ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD
Defendant:
TANDY CARTER, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everette, Jr. v. Peele et al
as 5:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Everette, Jr.
Defendant:
Regina W. Peele, Credited Solutions, Kim D. Saunder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Humane Society of the United States v. Raleigh Transit Authority, et al
as 5:2013cv00589
Defendant:
Raleigh Transit Authority , Corey D. Branch , Craig Ralph and others
Plaintiff:
Humane Society of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Toman et al
as 5:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
William C. Toman, Jr., R. M. Ashley, K. D. Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Beavers et al v. Keneally et al
as 1:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
James Earl Beavers and Beverly Sue Beavers
Defendant:
Kathryn Keneally, William C. Killian, Charles E. Atchley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becton v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
Carey Franklin Becton
Defendant:
City of Charlotte , Rodney Monroe , Thomas McGarity and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
