Cases 11 - 20 of 114
Aaron Bressi v. Tracy McCloud, et al
as 22-2730
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON J. BRESSI
Defendant:
TRACY MCCLOUD, BRITTANY DUKE, RONALD MCCLAY and others
WRIGHT v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wright
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, JOHN DOE, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
STAPLES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
MYISHA STAPLES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Terrance Shaw v. Paul Kemper, et al
as 22-1707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL S. KEMPER, Warden, JACK F. CHIOVATERO, RANDY MILLER and others
BOLTON v. TOBY et al
as 5:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
GEROME BOLTON and LILVENDER BOLTON
Defendant:
Warden ANNETTIA TOBY, Deputy Warden GEORGE IVEY, MELONTAE HAVIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPIVEY v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN HUMPHREY, MALONE, DR JOHN ROWLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRANT v. WASHINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv00427
Plaintiff:
DAYVON GRANT
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER CALPURNIA WASHINGTON, Warden ANNETTIA TOBY, DEP WARDEN SECURITY DEREK HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, CHARLES MIMS, CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
