Cases 11 - 20 of 291
McKinsey-Pace v. Tilley et al
as 6:2023cv01775
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Jerry Tilley and Michael Siemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stauffer et al v. Matarazzo et al
as 3:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
David William Stauffer, I and Laura L. Stauffer
Defendant:
Judith H. Matarazzo, State of Oregon Courts, Anna K. Sortun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Campbell v. United States Veterans Administration
as 3:2022cv01422
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oseguera v. Hoppe et al
as 1:2022cv01225
Plaintiff:
Javier Oseguera
Defendant:
Judge David G Hoppe and Judge Lung S. Hung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kerr-Daly v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Eamonn Kerr-Daly and Sarah Kerr-Daly
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Craig Wright, David Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
