Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Dynacon Corporation et al v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 4:2017cv01936
Plaintiff:
Dynacon Corporation, Dynacon Holdings, LLC, Dynacon Intercontinential LLP and others
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earle v. Atkinson et al
as 6:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Brian Clay Earle
Defendant:
Kevin Atkinson, Sam Threadgill, James Hildebrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kappos v. Meyers et al
as 1:2016cv01184
Defendant:
Commission on Judicial Performance, Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three, DOES 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kappos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantu v. Moody et al
as 7:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
Daniel Enrique Cantu
Defendant:
James M Moody, Erin S Labuz, Nathan Husak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Wickerham v. Waterman et al
as 5:2014cv00766
Defendant:
Suzanne Brooks, Alex DeLaRosa, Derek Dillman and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan C. Wickerham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Azadpour v. City of Euless et al
as 4:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Mostafa Aram Azadpour
Defendant:
City of Euless , Mary Lib Saleh , Tim Stinneford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
