Cases 11 - 20 of 22
DICUS v. LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01353
Defendant:
JARROD DUANE BRADBURY, DEVOY, LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MICHELLE DICUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2010cv01491
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE, INDIANA and POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL MCCREARY
Plaintiff:
DUANE WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Schiebenberger
as 1:2009cv00334
Plaintiff:
Steven Duane Warren
Defendant:
Kenneth Schiebenberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turngren v. Daugherty The Honorable et al
as 4:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Timothy Turngren
Defendant:
Duane Daugherty The Honorable and Jasper County Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAPE et al v. ENGLERT et al
as 3:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
DARBY HAPE and JERRI CURTIS
Defendant:
DUANE ENGLERT, JEFFREY HILL, JAMES STOLL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHOWALTER v. THE TOWN OF THORNTOWN et al
as 1:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
STUART SHOWALTER
Defendant:
THE TOWN OF THORNTOWN, THE TOWN OF COLFAX, CY GERDE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gates v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mark Robert Gates
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Jim McDonald, Park Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GUYINN v. WYNKOOP et al
as 1:2007cv00541
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GUYINN
Defendant:
SCOTT WYNKOOP, JEFF BURK, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER YOUMANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
