Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Johnson v. Head et al
as 5:2019cv00722
Defendant:
Glen Ray Smith, Eddie Davis, Lyn Head and others
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Holmes et al
as 1:2017cv00799
Plaintiff:
Thresa Lynn Williams
Defendant:
Doris Holmes, Alabama Mental Health Dept., Talladega City Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carstarphen v. Carr Allison Law Firm et al
as 1:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
Andre Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Carr Allison Law Firm , E. Glen Smith, Jr. and James C. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ray et al v. Calhoun County et al
as 1:2013cv01860
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Ray, Jr and Glen Edward Ray, Sr
Defendant:
Calhoun County , Calhoun County Sheriff's Office , Calhoun County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Scarbrough v. Tuscaloosa, Alabama, City of, The et al
as 7:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Scarbrough
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, City of, The, Walter Maddox, Steven D Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Graves et al v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2011cv00557
Plaintiff:
Gregory Graves and Darryl Sinkfield
Defendant:
City of Montgomery , Todd Strange , Cornelius Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
