Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01380
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilson v. Painter et al
as 3:2020cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wilson
Defendant:
Gordon J. Painter and Col. Jeffrey S Katz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethune-Hill et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 3:2014cv00852
Plaintiff:
Golden Bethune-Hill, Christa Brooks, Chauncey Brown and others
Defendant:
Virginia State Board of Elections, James B. Alcorn, Virginia Department of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
OneVirginia2021: Virginians for Fair Redistricting
Intervenor Defendant:
Virginia House of Delegates, William J. Howell and M. Kirkland Cox
Special Master:
Bernard Grofman
Interested Party:
Virginia State Conference of NAACP Branches, New Virginia Majority, Princeton University and others
Petitioner:
Wakeel Abdul-Sabur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00741
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gordon v. Federal IT Consulting
as 4:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Alex Gordon
Defendant:
Federal IT Consulting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bailey v. Lyons et al
as 3:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Bailey
Defendant:
James R. Lyons , Ashby Allen , Todd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
