Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Terlaje v. Government Of Guam
as 1:2018cv00042
Defendant:
Ciara L.S. Finona, Does I Through XX, Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport Authority, Guam and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro M. Terlaje
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
United States of America v. Government of Guam et al
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Government of Guam , Chamorro Land Trust Commission and Administrative Director of the Chamorro Land Trust Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lau v. Fernandez et al
as 1:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Gabriel H.T. Lau
Defendant:
Jon Fernandez, Antonette Santos and Guam Department of Education for the Government of Guam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Government Of Guam et al
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Government Of Guam, The Guam Election Commission and John F. Blas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hardman v. Government of Guam (Guam Police Department) et al
as 1:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Gillian Mary Hardman
Defendant:
Government of Guam (Guam Police Department), Benny T. Babauta, Carlo E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
