Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
HERZ v. GOODMAN et al
as 1:2016cv02868
Defendant:
CYNTHIA AYERS, GERALD BEPKO, SUSAN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HERZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv02102
Defendant:
NEWTON ALLEN, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hobbs v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2014cv01913
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hobbs
Defendant:
State of Indiana , William Goshert and Town of Pierceton Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00890
Defendant:
NEWTON ALLEN, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2012cv01309
Defendant:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
SRIVASTAVA v. PAYNE et al
as 1:2011cv00909
Defendant:
KENDALE ADAMS, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Black v. Goshert et al
as 3:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Julie Black
Defendant:
William Rocky Goshert, Rich Miotto, Gerke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
