Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Knight-Bey et al v. Chatlelain et al
as 8:2019cv00206
Defendant:
La Chelle A. Phillips, Douglas County Court Clerks Office, City Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Phyllis Marie Knight-Bey, Phyllis Marie Knight and Bin El Tribe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Tyler v. Schmader et al
as 8:2016cv00550
Defendant:
City of Omaha, John Doe Police, Judge Randall and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swift v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2015cv00372
Defendant:
City of Omaha, County Court, Judge Bowie and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Akins v. Martinez et al
as 4:2014cv03204
Plaintiff:
Samar Akins
Defendant:
Marsha C., Sam I. Cooper, Department of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Akins v. Judge Strong et al
as 4:2014cv03061
Plaintiff:
Samar Akins
Defendant:
Jan E. Beran, Jennifer Joakim and Judge Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
West v. Crnkovich et al
as 8:2012cv00273
Defendant:
Jessica Brown, Judge Timothy Burns, City of Omaha and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Tyler v. Denker et al
as 4:2011cv03174
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Kevin Denker, Douglas County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James E: Kyles v. Heineman et al
as 8:2011cv00260
Defendant:
Judge Lawrence E. Barrett, Deonne Bruning, Jon Bruning and others
Plaintiff:
James E: Kyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Kopf
as 4:2011cv03118
Plaintiff:
Waya Tsalagi Jones
Defendant:
Judge Richard Kopf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kyles v. Heineman et al
as 8:2011cv00176
Defendant:
Judge Lawrence E. Barrett, Deonne Bruning, Jon Bruning and others
Plaintiff:
James Earl: Kyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
