Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Williams v. King et al
as 1:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Janet F King, Richard J. Sullivan and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States
as 1:2022cv06365
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States
as 1:2022cv04099
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States
as 1:2022cv02727
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams et al v. King et al
as 1:2022cv02134
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Janet F. King and Richard J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams, Scott & Associates LLC et al v. United States
as 1:2022cv02133
Plaintiff:
Williams, Scott & Associates LLC and John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. King et al
as 3:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
Janet F. King and Richard J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. United States
as 3:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Sullivan
as 1:2022cv03823
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
Richard J. Sullivan and Janet F. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santana v. Naugatuck et al
as 3:2020cv00752
Plaintiff:
William A. Santana and William Santana
Defendant:
John T. Williams and Borough of Naugatuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
