Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Hamstead v. West Virginia State Police et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Julie Ann Hamstead
Defendant:
West Virginia State Police , D.R. Walker , The City of Ranson, West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2016cv10191
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
Melissa Gillespie, Melissa Shephard, Meghan Gofreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2016cv10195
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
Melissa Gillespie, Melissa Shephard, Meghan Gofreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Blankenship et al
as 2:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
Donald L. Blankenship, Daniel L. Stickler and Jackson Kelly, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chernutan v. Anderson et al
as 5:2015cv11539
Plaintiff:
Carolyn J. Chernutan
Defendant:
Michael Anderson and Kelly Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Atkins et al
as 3:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hopkins
Defendant:
Atkins, Ryder , Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. City of Parkersburg et al
as 6:2013cv23260
Plaintiff:
Charles Kelly
Defendant:
City of Parkersburg and Joseph Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Mines et al
as 5:2013cv09351
Plaintiff:
Michelle E. Kelly
Defendant:
Richard Mines and Greenbrier County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bloom v. The Board of Education of Monogalia County et al
as 1:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Bloom
Defendant:
The Board of Education of Monogalia County , Barbara L. Parsons , Michael L. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
