Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Knight v. City of Fayetteville, et al
as 5:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
Tracie Knight
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville , Denton Little and Harold Medlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Everette, Jr. v. Peele et al
as 5:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Everette, Jr.
Defendant:
Regina W. Peele, Credited Solutions, Kim D. Saunder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
Brett v. U.S. Marshal Knight et al
as 5:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Knight and U.S. Marshal Gary Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Arrington v. The City of Rocky Mount et al
as 4:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Toney Lee Arrington
Defendant:
The City of Rocky Mount, B. C. Lawton, M. B. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Toney L. Arrington
Defendant:
City of Rocky Mount, James L. Knight, M. B. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FISHER-BORNE et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2012cv00589
Plaintiff:
MARCIE FISHER-BORNE , CHANTELLE FISHER-BORNE , TERRI BECK and others
Defendant:
JOHN W. SMITH , DAVID L. CHURCHILL and ARCHIE L. SMITH III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
