Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Barnett v. Hawkins County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Hawkins County, Tennessee, Michael Martin, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diei v. Boyd et al
as 2:2021cv02071
Defendant:
Charles Hatcher, Decosta Jenkins, Jamie Woodson and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Diei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Lawson et al (TV2)
as 2:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Chad Nave, Emary Bryant, Bradley County Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Wade Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. Bowater Employees Credit Union et al
as 1:2019cv00335
Plaintiff:
Justa Guthrie
Defendant:
Bradley County Sheriff Dept., Bradley County, Bowater Employees Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keathley v. Cambell County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2019cv00364
Defendant:
Cambell County Sheriffs Dept, James Farmer, Jordon Huskey and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly C Keathley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hawkins County, TN et al (PLR3)
as 2:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Hawkins County, TN and Paula Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lands v. Hamilton County Government et al (TWP1)
as 1:2018cv00289
Defendant:
Daniel Rowell, Jeremy Lawson, Adam Williams and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Presnell v. Crockett et al
as 2:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Morgan Presnell
Defendant:
David Crockett, Unicoi County Clerk's Office and William B Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Eher et al (PLR2)
as 2:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Scott Henson
Defendant:
Micheal Eher, Morristown Hamblin Hospital, Nanny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
