Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Tipton v. Houston County Board of Education et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 1:2017cv00588
Plaintiff:
Shannon Tipton
Defendant:
Houston County Board of Education , David Sewell , Tim Pitchford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cherokee County Board of Education et al
as 4:2017cv01208
Plaintiff:
Rosella Jones
Defendant:
Cherokee County Board of Education and Jeffery Lane Crane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holton v. Bama Lanes Prattville, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Amanda Holton
Defendant:
Bama Lanes Prattville, LLC, Christopher Williams and Shelly Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mayo v. Capps et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Christopher Capps, Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Mayo et al (JOINT ASSIGN) (MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Samantha Alexis Mayo , Kathy Ausley , Domby Levon Ausley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Eggleston et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, Dana Horn Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00548
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2015cv00949
Plaintiff:
Lameco M. Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Nathan Elmore, Jeffery Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
