Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Griham v. Memphis City Police Department City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02506
Plaintiff:
Justin griham, Emmanuel Meniru, Justin Jaico Griham and others
Defendant:
Memphis City Police Department City of Memphis, Taiyuan Brooks, A Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Malone v. Angle et al (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Steven Angle, Rusty Wright and Mark Wharton
Plaintiff:
Chris Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Cocke County et al
as 2:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Lt Rae Edison, Sgt Mark Keiser, Lt Stephen Revill and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Malone v. Municipal Government of the City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00437
Plaintiff:
Maurice Montrell Malone
Defendant:
Municipal Government of the City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, John Doe and Officer M. Mogoddham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boucher v. Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Clayton Boucher
Defendant:
Johnson City Tennessee, Shane Malone and Paul Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fritts et al v. Simerly et al
as 2:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Carter County, Tennessee, Jonathan Simerly, Michael Malone and others
Plaintiff:
Garry Fritts and Cynthia Fritts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Malone v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2018cv02251
Plaintiff:
Patricia Malone
Defendant:
Shelby County, Paul Hagerman, Austin Scholefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone et al v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2018cv02201
Plaintiff:
April Malone and Celitria Watson
Defendant:
Shelby County, Paul Hagerman, Austin Scholfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
