Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGuire v. Voss et al
as 8:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Omaha Police Dept., Amanda Miller and Voss
Plaintiff:
Shawn McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nimmer v. Heavican et al
as 4:2018cv03123
Defendant:
Hon. John R Freudenberg, Hon. William B. Cassel, Hon. Lindsey Miller-Lerman and others
Plaintiff:
John C Nimmer and John C. Nimmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wang v. The State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00375
Defendant:
Kara Beals, Kersten Borer, Children's Hospital and Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Bo Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wang Anderson v. The State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2017cv03073
Defendant:
Tina Anderson, Kara Beals, Kersten Borer and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Yang Wang Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carter v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2016cv00389
Plaintiff:
Kristina M. Carter
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Corey M. Gorden and Bert Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv03012
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
