Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrington et al v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2019cv00121
Defendant:
John Doe Omaha Police Officer #1, Michelle A. Peters, John Doe Omaha Police Officer #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Brandy Kroese, Joseph Evans, Shane Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Hawco et al
as 4:2018cv03170
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Williams
Defendant:
Douglas Hawco, Michelle Hawco and Christopher Hawco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrington et al v. Strong et al
as 8:2018cv00383
Defendant:
Pete Ricketts, John and Jane Doe Nebraska State Patrol Officers #1-#800, Colene Hinchy and others
Plaintiff:
Meltech, Inc., Shane Harrington, Midwest Girls Club and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurtz v. Doe #4
as 8:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Kurtz
Defendant:
Michelle Doe #4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicklas, et al v. Kelly, et al
as 4:2017cv03131
Defendant:
John Does (1-50), Joe Kelly and Lancaster County Attorney
Plaintiff:
Michelle Nicklas, Jane Roes (1-50) and John Roes (1-50)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hargis v. Brennan et al
as 4:2017cv03052
Defendant:
Megan J Brennan and Pam Cook
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hargis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hargis v. Brennan et al
as 8:2017cv03052
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan and Pam Cook
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hargis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bartunek v. Omaha Police Department et al
as 8:2016cv00568
Defendant:
Michelele Bang, City of Omaha, Mark Desler and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory P. Bartunek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
