Cases 11 - 20 of 228
Scott v. Ellington
as 2:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Angelo Scott
Defendant:
Barbour County Alabama, Officer Ellington and Barbour County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gosa et al v. Hampton
as 5:2023cv01669
Defendant:
Ricky Hampton and Finesse
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gosa and Scott Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Catoe v. City of Sheffield Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Will Catoe
Defendant:
City of Sheffield Alabama, Ricky Terry, Scott Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hall v. Kenney et al
as 2:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hall
Defendant:
Demetrius Antoine Kenney, Joseph E Walden, Jeffrey Brumlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
West Alabama Women's Center et al v. Marshall (MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
West Alabama Women's Center, Yashica Robinson and Alabama Women's Center
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R. Adair, T. Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howard v. Pickens County Alabama
as 7:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Pickens County Alabama, Keith Booty Cox, Jeremy Herd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Hoover, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Harris
Defendant:
Hoover, City of and Scott Prentiss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
