Cases 11 - 20 of 37
v. Moore et al
as 2:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Christopher Stewart and Sheriff Michael Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster et al v. Secretary of the Navy et al
as 2:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dufour, Andrew Calhoun, Timothy Demy and others
Defendant:
The Secretary of the Navy, The Chief of Naval Personnel and The Navy Chief of Chaplains
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01369
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
STEWART v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2016cv00682
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ann Stewart
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., Ronald C. Machen, Jr., Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Stewart v. The University of North Carolina System et al
as 1:2015cv01487
Plaintiff:
Fenyang Ajamu Stewart
Defendant:
The University of North Carolina System, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University, National Institute of Aerospace Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Array Information Technology et al
as 1:2015cv01173
Plaintiff:
Reginald Franklin Jones
Defendant:
Array Information Technology, Cathy Boland and Stewart Kidston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stewart v. Comey et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Tori Stewart
Defendant:
James Comey , Michael S. Rogers , John Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
