Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Purvis et al v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ms. LaTonya Purvis, Infant R. J. and LaTonya Purvis
Defendant:
Suffolk County, Suffolk County Police Department, John and Jane Doe Police Officers 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gong v. Sarnoff et al
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Junwu Gong
Defendant:
Sarnoff M Stuart, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Carl M Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Kartiganer v. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Queens et al
as 1:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Adam Kartiganer and Adam Steiger
Defendant:
New York State Supreme Court for the County of Queens, Judge Wyatt N. Gibbons, Gary Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e2o
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Blankson v. ACMH, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04892
Defendant:
Santa Marie Rodriguez, ACMH, Inc., Ms. Nicole and others
Plaintiff:
Kobe Adjei Blankson
Debtor:
Emma L. Bowen Community Service Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
