Cases 11 - 20 of 502
Colon v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jaylene Colon
Defendant:
City of New Haven, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antar v. Shea et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Michael P Shea, Omar A. Williams, State of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antar v. Torres Shlatz et al
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Jessica C Torres Shlatz, State of Connecticut, William T. Cremins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antar v. Grogins et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Auden Grogins, Scott Jones, Jane Grossman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fraser v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Gabriy'el Fraser
Defendant:
City of New Haven, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson et al v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Karen Jackson and E.F.
Defendant:
City of New Haven, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rose v. USA
as 3:2023cv01642
Plaintiff:
Aubrey W Rose, Jr
Defendant:
United States Of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
