Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUNCHES v. PATTERSON et al
as 3:2020cv00066
Defendant:
WILLIAM SIMPSON, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSHUA PATTERSON and others
Plaintiff:
ELTON FUNCHES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2020cv00812
Defendant:
JANE DOE, LANDON DEAN, HENRY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04300
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
STUMM et al v. TOWN OF PITTSBORO
as 1:2017cv04296
Plaintiff:
BRIAN T HELMER, JASON A STUMM and MATTHEW W STUMM
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT SCOTT KING, CHRISTI PATTERSON, TOWN OF PITTSBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TALBERT v. PATTERSON et al
as 1:2017cv03303
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF INDIANA, INDIANA STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH and NADINE PATTERSON
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE THOMAS TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seman v. Troyer, et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Bradley Seman
Defendant:
Tim R Troyer , Adam Crall , Eric Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
