Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Saturn v. Austin Bergstrom International Airport et al
as 1:2020cv01176
Defendant:
Dell Medical Center at UT System, Washington Mutual Bank, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Saturn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Starke v. State of Texas
as 3:2020cv03334
Plaintiff:
Charles B Starke, Jr
Defendant:
State of Texas, Adam Pauyer, NFN Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelan v. Town of Hollywood Park
as 5:2020cv00641
Plaintiff:
Eugena L Phelan
Defendant:
Town of Hollywood Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmidt v. Hawksworth et al
as 4:2019cv00688
Defendant:
Marla Hawksworth, Jon Donahue, Robert Hager and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. US Department of Defense et al
as 3:2019cv01267
Defendant:
Town of Addison Texas, City of Dallas, Department of Treasury and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prelow v. Town of Pantego, Texas et al
as 4:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jerald Dwayne Prelow
Defendant:
Town of Pantego Texas and Benjamin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INVESTMENT BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. et al v. Cichon et al
as 3:2016cv00497
Defendant:
AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACQUISITIONS, INC, AHV ARROWHEAD PLACE, INC., AHV DESERT VILLAS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ARROWHEAD PLACE, LTD., CACTUS ROSE, LTD., DESERT BREEZE, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
