Cases 21 - 30 of 264
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Augustine, Franklin County Sheriff's Office, Judge Stanley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gonzales v. Missouri State Highway Patrol et al
as 4:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Humberto Gonzales
Defendant:
Missouri State Highway Patrol, Colonel Eric T. Olson, Trooper Daniel J. Dalton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham et al v. Thornhill et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Cunningham and Chanda McKee
Defendant:
Judge Matthew Thornhill, Brandon T Pittenger, Pittenger Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
David L. Jones
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hornbeck v. Archdiocese of St. Louis et al
as 4:2022cv00345
Defendant:
Good Shepherd Children and Family Services, Catholic Charities of St. Louis, Archdiocese of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Hornbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
