Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Prosser et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Prosser, Brooke Prosser, Fred Rush and others
Defendant:
B. T. Roberts, Clark Sahlie, James W. Rane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Alabama Department of Revenue
as 7:2021cv00475
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Revenue
Plaintiff:
James Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Clarke County Schools
as 1:2019cv00272
Defendant:
Clarke County Schools, Clarke County School District, Julia Ann Deas and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Watts v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Heather Holston, State Of Alabama, Eucellis Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilke v. Driggers et al (MAG+)
as 2:2019cv00349
Defendant:
Jamie Neeley, Mathew M. Baker, Tenesha Whatley and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Ayers Wilke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burks v. Publishers Clearing House et al
as 2:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Harland Clarke, Publishers Clearing House, Huntington Service Company and others
Plaintiff:
Buford L Burks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Almond et al v. Randolph County, Alabama et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
Randy Moore, Donnie Strain, Jody McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Roberts Almond and Gregory Jack Almond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. NCP Solutions LLC
as 2:2017cv01847
Defendant:
Harland Clarke Corp, Harland Clarke Corp doing business as NCP Solutions and NCP Solutions LLC
Plaintiff:
Sherri Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
