Cases 21 - 30 of 44
ARMSTRONG v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, et al
as 1:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
LAMONTE BURTON ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, J. F. WHITT, DAVID SPAGNOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Yopp Properties, LLC
as 7:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
Barbara Armstrong
Defendant:
Yopp Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Armstrong v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2013cv00627
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
North Carolina, Charles Miller Law Office , Sacramento, CA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG et al v. THE VILLAGE OF PINEHURST et al
as 1:2013cv00407
Defendant:
THE VILLAGE OF PINEHURST , OFFICER JERRY MCDONALD , OFFICER TINA S. SHEPPARD and others
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF RONALD H. ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Armstrong v. Cooper, et al
as 5:2012cv00810
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, John Doe, T.C. William and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Medlin Motors, Inc., et al
as 5:2012cv00806
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Medlin Motors, Inc. and Don Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Woodard
as 5:2012cv00807
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Calvin Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Woodard et al
as 5:2012cv00805
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Calvin Woodard, Clads E. Ownes, Robert Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Richards
as 5:2012cv00811
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Julie Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
