Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv13155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 13-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CHARLES MOORE
Interested Party:
MARC A. WHALEY, BOURNEWOOD HOSPITAL, IRINA MEZEHBOUSKY, MD and others
Shu Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 12-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
PAULA AENNGER, THEA A. STEWART, ST. MARY'S CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe et al v. Boston Public Schools
as 1:2007cv11869
Plaintiff:
Dean Doe, Dean Doe, Linda Doe and others
Defendant:
Boston Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Jordan v. IRS Automated, et al
as 00-2179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODUS JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, R. M. CONNALLY, THOMAS M. QUINN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
