Cases 21 - 30 of 293
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer E Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cousin v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06349
Plaintiff:
Michael Cousin
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Joshua Woodward, alec konrad and others
Cross Defendant:
Peter Bandulj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Buchanan v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06292
Plaintiff:
Kevonna Buchanan
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Henry C. Favor, Naser Zenelovic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06162
Plaintiff:
Lekia Smith
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, P.O. Charles LoTempio, Charles LoTempio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Miller v. Warren et al
as 6:2023cv06130
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamell Miller
Defendant:
Lovely Ann Warren, City Hall and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06583
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Rogers
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Mark Allen, Stanley Kaminski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv03090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
