Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Parks v. USA et al
as 3:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
William A. Parks
Defendant:
USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. USA et al
as 3:2009mc00246
Plaintiff:
William A. Parks
Defendant:
USA, Barack Obama, Social Security Admin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.G. v. Alabama Dept of Mental Health & Mental Retardation
as 7:2009cv01369
Plaintiff:
R.G.
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Mental Health & Mental Retardation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lorenzo Real et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2009cv03770
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Real and Leigh Real
Defendant:
State of California, Dept. of Mental Health, Atascadero State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2009cv00085
Plaintiff:
USA, USA and USA
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svc and Luis Perez
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Bradley v. Smith et al
as 3:2008cv01271
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant:
James R. Smith, State of CT Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and Michael P. Starkowski
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bradley v. Smith et al
as 3:2008mc00282
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant:
James R. Smith, State of CT Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and Michael P. Starkowski
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008mc00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
