Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Lewis v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2016cv03198
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Bruce Rauner, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. National Rifle Association et al
as 6:2016cv01210
Plaintiff:
James D. Lewis
Defendant:
National Rifle Association, House of Representatives, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Lewis v. Internationl Court et al
as 1:2016cv01235
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis
Defendant:
Internationl Court, Pontiac Correctional Center, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Lewis
as 3:2016cv03098
Plaintiff:
Henry Mallory, Jr
Defendant:
James A Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Spangler v. City of Pismo Beach et al
as 2:2016cv00289
Defendant:
Tom Baasch, Jon Biggs, City of Pismo Beach and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Spangler
Unknown:
Frederick Kenneth Glick
Lewis v. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urbana Affairs et al
as 1:2015cv01401
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis
Defendant:
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urbana Affairs, United States of America, Committee on Foreign Relations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nealman v. Laughlin et al
as 1:2015cv01579
Plaintiff:
Tawna Z. Nealman
Defendant:
Ryan P. Laughlin, Robert Maben, Christian Z. Snook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv04104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
LEWIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv02547
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. LEWIS , JAMES A. LEWIS, II , MARQUIS J. LEWIS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JONATHAN JOSEY, PAUL GROVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
