Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Dancers Jane Doe et al v. Karl Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
Dancers Jane Doe and Fantasy Girls, LLC
Defendant:
Elite Investigations, Karl Hall and Reno, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Gerstenberger et al
as 2:2017cv02727
Petitioner:
Jane Doe
Respondent:
Shawn Gerstenberger and University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00557
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
James v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2016cv01979
Plaintiff:
Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas, Ashley Fernandez, Cindy Moyes and others
Interested Party:
Catrina James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Magnetic v. Regional Justice Center et al
as 2:2015cv01632
Defendant:
Colleen Baharau, Judge David Barker, Judge Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
