Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LEWIS et al v. DARBY TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv04949
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. LEWIS and KESHATA LAWSON
Defendant:
DARBY TOWNSHIP , RICHARD SINSULLA , LEONARD MCDEVITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SPCA et al
as 2:2013cv07403
Plaintiff:
DENEKEI LAWSON and JAMES HINES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA SPCA, RICH LOOS, G. JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMELIO v. DOBROSIELSKI et al
as 2:2013cv01546
Plaintiff:
RIGONALDO N. DEMELIO
Defendant:
LORI DOBROSIELSKI , SHERIFF MULLEN , ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAWSON et al v. CROSS et al
as 2:2013cv05955
Plaintiff:
JERRY K. LAWSON, HIANIF A. LAWSON, CRYSTAL K. LAWSON and others
Defendant:
SHANDA CROSS, THOMAS MARTINKA, THOMAS DONNYELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LAWSON v. CITY OF COATESVILLE et al
as 2:2012cv06100
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PATRICK LAWSON
Defendant:
CITY OF COATESVILLE, JULIUS CANALE, BRENDEN BOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
