Cases 21 - 30 of 39
NEAL v. WILKERSON et al
as 4:2016cv00044
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY GOVERNMENT, CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and TIM G. WILKERSON
Plaintiff:
CLINTON F. NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WILDE v. ROSENBERG et al
as 1:2015cv01051
Defendant:
JAMES ALOISIO, CALLNET CALL CENTER SERVICES INC., CRAIG DENISON and others
Plaintiff:
SHELLA WILDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal et al v. Backs
as 1:2015cv00168
Defendant:
Rick Backs
Plaintiff:
Mikel Neal and Rachelle Fears-Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEALE v. BLACK TOWNSHIP, POSEY COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 3:2015cv00082
Defendant:
BLACK TOWNSHIP, POSEY COUNTY, INDIANA and LINDSAY SUITS
Plaintiff:
MARY NEALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMM v. FAITH et al
as 4:2014cv00123
Defendant:
JAMES BIDDLE, SEAN CLEMONS, RODNEY ENGLERT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00955
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Management:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Neal v. Pauley et al
as 1:2012cv00343
Plaintiff:
Anthony Neal
Defendant:
Tim Pauley , Joel Thomas and City of Marion Indiana The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GOODPASTER, et al v. MAYOR et al
as 1:2012cv00669
Plaintiff:
1711, INC, DEBORA BAKER, STEPHEN BAKER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL, COUNTY OF MARION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
