Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ARGENTINA v. RIVERS CASINO
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ARGENTINA
Defendant:
RIVERS CASINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COCHRAN v. UMH 3 RIVERS LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01271
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER COCHRAN
Defendant:
UMH 3 RIVERS LLC doing business as NEW COLONY and JEREMY STILLWAGON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Murphy v. DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv03115
Plaintiff:
Holly Murphy
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY, River Drive Service Center, Inc., Matthew Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv03115
Plaintiff:
Holly Murphy
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY, River Drive Service Center, Inc., Matthew Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schock et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv01143
Plaintiff:
Chanel Schock, Zachary Schock, Conrad Schock and others
Defendant:
Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River, Park Ranger Kevin Reish, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
