Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanchez et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2012cv01454
Plaintiff:
Orlando Sanchez and Frank Salman
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Llovera v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2012cv00712
Plaintiff:
Jesus Sanchez Llovera
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Maricopa County Sheriff's Office , Joseph M Arpaio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maciocha et al v. Child Protective Services et al
as 4:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Wilson Maciocha and Christopher Maciocha
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Ramon Sanchez, Amanda Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stadler et al v. City of Phoenix et al
as 2:2010cv01072
Plaintiff:
Terry Stadler, Estate of Kristi Stadler and Kennedy Larson-Garcia
Defendant:
City of Phoenix , Phoenix Police Department , State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieblas v. City of Douglas et al
as 4:2009cv00604
Plaintiff:
Sam Nieblas
Defendant:
City of Douglas, City of Douglas, Michael Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nieblas v. City of Douglas et al
as 4:2009cv00602
Defendant:
City of Douglas, Michael Gomez, Margaret Morales and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Nieblas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
